municipal politics

Troubles at the Trough: Quesnel Councillor Paull asks some tough questions of Mayor Sjostrom's spending habits

Troubles at the Trough: Quesnel Councillor Paull asks some tough questions of Mayor Sjostrom's spending habits

QUESNEL'S CITY AUDITOR RONALD E. RASMUSSEN FEELS MAYOR SJOSTROM'S CHEQUE VOUCHERS ARE "WELL CARRIED OUT", "SUPPORTED", "SATISFACTORILY APPROVED" AND "REASONABLE".

CITY COUNCILLOR RON PAULL BEGS TO DIFFER AND ASKS SOME "TOUGH" QUESTIONS IN HIS SEPTEMBER 28TH LETTER TO THE CARIBOO OBSERVER REGARDING THE MANNER IN WHICH RASMUSSEN HAS DEALT WITH THE ISSUE.

Editor,

For some time, I have resisted growing public pressure to weigh in on the thorny issue of the mayor’s expenses, but the city auditor’s letter was the proverbial straw that has raised more questions than answers. Was the auditor instructed to adjudicate only the paper trail and not the eligibility and propriety of some of the mayor’s expenses? Why didn’t his opinion go beyond simply saying that all the paperwork is in order? Why, in spite of saying in his letter that he conducted a “review of the overall purpose of the supporting documentation” did he not say (or at least politely hint) that some of those expenses were clearly not eligible to have been claimed?  Is he not aware that certain of those expenses are not eligible for reimbursement because under the Canada Income Tax Act, all local government elected officials receive a large portion (in our case it is one third) of their pay as an expense allowance. The City’s Council Indemnity Bylaw No. 1385 of 1997 says, in part “….provide for the payment of an annual indemnity to the Mayor and councillors of the City …., a part of which may be an allowance for expenses incidental to their duties”. In the body of the bylaw, Section 3  states “One-third of such annual indemnity amounts paid to each member of Council shall be paid as an allowance for expenses incidental to the discharge of his or her office.”  That language is repeated in the Council Policy for Council Remuneration.

City of Quesnel Threatens Sentinel Publisher with Defamation Suit

City of Quesnel Threatens Sentinel Publisher with Defamation Suit

[Editor's Note: On June 9th, 2011 in response to comments made in the Quesnel Cariboo Observer concerning the actions of City of Quesnel finance chair Coun. Sushil Thapar I sent a letter to the Observer which was later published in the newspaper on June 21, 2011 under the heading, "Tough questions need to be asked."

On June 23, 2011 the Observer published a response to my letter from Mayor Mary Sjostrom wherein she denied comments that I had made concerning the hiring of City Manager John Stecyk. That same day I received an email from the City of Quesnel's law firm in Vancouver, Murdy & McAllister, which contained a pdf letter that stated I had made "defamatory" statements concerning Steyck and that I was requested to "forthwith retract your defamatory comments and issue an apology for same, failing which legal action against you may be pursued." A cc copy of this letter was also sent to Autumn Macdonald, Editor of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer.

Subscribe to RSS - municipal politics